Email this article The YouTube makeup tutorial Video. A preliminary linguistic analysis of the language of “makeup gurus”
Abstract
Abstract – Due to its video sharing policy which freely allows users to communicate all over the world, YouTube has become one of the preferred Web platforms used by the digital community of makeup lovers. As a matter of fact, YouTube seems particularly suited to host announcements of new makeup collections, products’ reviews as well as video tutorials. Both cosmetic brands and single users have opened channels on the platform, but makeup discourse on YouTube is arguably dominated by the latter. Differentiating between unaffiliated amateurs and YouTubers who more or less openly work for makeup companies as digital influencers is difficult. Recent studies on communicative practices on YouTube, however, stress that in order to understand the complex nature of the famous video sharing website, the professional/non-professional dichotomy is not particularly relevant, whereas other dynamics are more research worthy. One of them is the “guru” phenomenon. “Gurus” are content creators who are particularly authoritative in a specific field, have a considerable follower base thanks to their expertise and are often paid by brands in order to promote their products. The makeup domain too has witnessed the emergence of a group of popular and influential users who are typically referred to as “makeup gurus”. Their ability to stand out from the multiplicity of similar channels arguably depends not only on their knowledge of the field, but also on their communication skills and specifically on their successful use of the makeup video genre. Against this backdrop, this study sets out to codify the relatively new genre of the makeup tutorial providing it with adequate categories which at the moment appear to be lacking. Adopting the analytical framework provided by discourse analysis, it examines the generic, rhetorical and linguistic practices of makeup gurus and sheds light on the ways gurus discursively construct their identity as well as represent the idea of beauty and makeup.
References
Adami E. 2009, ‘Do You Tube?’ When Communication Turns into Video E-nteraction, in Torretta D., Dossena M. and Sportelli A. (eds.), Migration of Forms, Forms of Migration. Proceedings of the 23rd AIA Conference, Progedit, Bari, pp. 371-386.
Askehave I. and Swales J.M. 2001, Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and a Possible Solution, in “Applied Linguistics” 23 [2], pp. 195-212.
Bhatia V.K. 1993, Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, Longman, London.
Blackshaw P. 2006, How Do We Know What’s Advertising on YouTube?, “ConsumerGeneratedMedia.com”, http://notetaker.typepad.com/cgm/2006/11/post.html (4.19.2017).
Bolter J.D. 1991, Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Boyd M.S. 2008, (New) Political Genres for the Masses? YouTube in the 2008 US Presidential Campaign, in Caliendo G., Polese V. and Sarangi S. (eds.), Genres on the Move. Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Napoli, pp. 27-44.
Brown P. and Levinson S.C. 1987, Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Burgess J. and Green, J. 2009, YouTube. Online Video and Participatory Culture, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Chou W.S., Hunt Y., Folkers A. and Augustson E. 2011. Cancer Survivorship in the Age of YouTube and Social Media: A Narrative Analysis, in “Journal of Medical Internet Research” 13 [1], http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e7/ (4.19.2017).
Conet A. and Saxena S. 2014, Video Marketing Tips: How to Improve Audience Retention, Webvideos Ltd, http://www.webvideos.co.uk/video-marketing-tips-how-to-improve-audience-retention/ (4.19.2017).
De Bruyn A. and Lilien G.L. 2008, A Multi-stage Model of Word-of-mouth Influence through Viral Marketing, in “International Journal of Research in Marketing” 25 [3], pp. 151-163.
Devitt A.J. 2009, Re-Fusing Form in Genre Studies, in Giltrow J. and Stein D. (eds.), Genres in the Internet, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 27-47.
Dynel M. 2014, Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 73, pp. 37-52.
Fairclough N. 1989, Language and Power, Routledge, London/New York.
Fairclough N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Fairclough N. 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, Longman, London.
Fairclough N. 2003, Analysing Discourse – Textual Research for Social Research, Routledge, New York.
Ferrari S. 2015, Marketing Strategies in The Age of Web 3.0, in Issa T. and Isaas P. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence Technologies and the Evolution of the Web 3.0, IGI Publishing, Hersey, PA, pp. 307-324.
Foot K., Xenos M., Schneider S., Kluver R. and Jankowski N. 2009, Electoral Web Production Practices in Cross-national Perspective: The Relative Influence of National Development, Political Culture, and Web Genre 2008, in Chadwick A. and Howard P. (eds.), Handbook of Internet Politics, Routledge, London, pp. 40-55.
Foucault M. 1969, L’archéologie du savoir, Gallimard, Paris.
Freeman B. and Chapman S. 2007, Is “YouTube” Telling or Selling You Something? Tobacco Content on the Video-sharing Website YouTube, in “Tob Control” 16, pp. 207-210.
García-Rapp F. 2016, The Digital Media Phenomenon of YouTube Beauty Gurus: The Case of Buzbeauty, in “International Journal of Web-Based Communities” 12 [4], pp. 360-375.
Garzone G. 2007, Genres, Multimodality and the World Wide Web: Theoretical Issues, in Garzone G., Poncini G. and Catenaccio P. (eds.), Multimodality in Corporate Communication: Web Genres and Discursive Identity, FrancoAngeli, Milan, pp. 15-30.
Hatim B. 1984, A Text Typological Approach to Syllabus Design in Translation Training, in “The Incorporated Linguist” 23 [3], pp. 146-149.
Hatim B. and Mason I. 1990, Discourse and the Translator, Longman, London.
Hyland K. 2001, Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles, in “Written Communication” 18 [4], pp. 549-574.
Hyland K. 2010, Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing, in “Nordic Journal of English Studies” 9 [2], pp. 125-143.
Jansen, B.J., Zhang M., Sobel K. and Chowdury A. 2009, Twitter Power: Tweets As Electronic Word Of Mouth, in “Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology” 60 [11], pp. 2169-2188.
Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein M. 2011a, The Early Bird Catches The News: Nine Things You Should Know About Micro-blogging, in “Business Horizons” 54 [2], pp. 105-113.
Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein M. 2011b, Two Hearts in 3/4 Time: How to Waltz the Social Media Viral Marketing Dance, in “Business Horizons” 54 [3], pp. 253-263.
Kaur K, Arumugam N. and Yunus N.M. 2013, Beauty Product Advertisements: A Critical Discourse Analysis, in “Asian Social Science” 9 [3], pp. 61-71.
Kedveš A. 2013, Beauty Is (Beyond) Make Up? Critical Discourse Analysis of UK Beauty Community, Conference Presentation, 6es Rencontres de Sémantique et Pragmatique 2 July 2013, Orléans, https://www.academia.edu/3850386/Beauty_is_Beyond_Make-Up_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_of_
UK_Beauty_Community (4.19.2017).
Kwon E.S. and Sung Y. 2011, Follow Me! Global Marketers’ Twitter Use, in “Journal of Interactive Advertising”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271671809_Follow_Me_Global_Marketers’_Twitter_Use (4.19.2017).
Landow G.P. 1992, Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Lange P.G. 2008, Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube, in “Journal of Computer-mediated Communication” 13, pp. 361-380.
Lilleker D.G., Koc-Michalska K., Schweitzer E.J., Jacunski M., Jackson N. and Vedel, T. 2011, Informing, Engaging, Mobilizing or Interacting: Searching for a European Model of Web Campaigning, in “European Journal of Communication” 26, pp. 195-213.
Mata F.J. and Quesada A. 2013, Web 2.0, Social Networks and E-commerce as Marketing Tools, in “Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research” 9 [1], pp. 56-69.
Pace S. 2008, YouTube: An Opportunity for Consumer Narrative Analysis?, in “Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal” 11 [2], pp. 213-226.
Phakdeephasook S. 2009, Discourse of Femininity in Advertisements in Thai Health and Beauty Magazines, in “Manusya. Journal of Humanities” 12 [2], pp. 63-89.
Phelps J.E., Lewis R., Mobilio L., Perry D. and Raman N. 2004, Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along Email, in “Journal of Advertising Research” 44, pp. 333-348.
Reichert R. 2014, Evaluation and Self-Evaluation on YouTube: Designing the Self in Make-Up Tutorials, in Suhr C. (ed.), Online Evaluation of Creativity and the Arts, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 95-111.
Ringrow H. 2012, “Because We’re Worth It” (?): Femininity and Cosmetics Advertising Slogans in a Cross-cultural Perspective, PALA Conference Proceedings, http://www.academia.edu/4289025/_Because_
were_worth_it_Femininity_and_cosmetics_advertising_slogans_in_a_cross-cultural_perspective_
from_PALA_Conference_Proceedings_2012 (4.19.2017).
Spyer J. 2013, Talking Through Mirrors. YouTube Makeup Video Tutorials as Gellian “Art Traps”, https://www.academia.edu/23149254/Tutorials_as_Traps_V01 (4.19.2017).
Swales J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tolson A. 2010, A New Authenticity? Communicative Practices on YouTube, in “Critical Discourse Studies” 7 [4], pp. 277-289.
Vesnic-Alujevic L. and van Bauwel S. 2014, YouTube: A Political Advertising Tool? A Case Study of the Use of YouTube in the Campaign for the European Parliament Elections 2009, in “Journal of Political Advertising” 13 [3], pp. 195-212.
Watkins B.A. and Lewis, R. 2013, Twitter as Gateway to Relationship Building, in Noor Al-D., Hana S. and Hendricks J.A. (eds.), Social Media and Strategic Communication, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 25-44.
Wensch M. 2008, An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube, Library of Congress, USA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPAO-lZ4_hU (4.19.2017).
Werlich E. 1976, A Text Grammar of English, Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg.
Wodak R. 2008, The Contribution of Critical Linguistics to the Analysis of Discriminatory Prejudices and Stereotypes in the Language of Politics, in Wodak R. and Koller V. (eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, Mouton de Gruyter, New York/Berlin, pp. 291-316.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
