Sensemaking processes and social representations of COVID-19 in multi-voiced public discourse: Illustrative examples of institutional and media communication in ten countries


Abstract


The role of communication in a pandemic emergency is crucial because it contributes to the spread of collective interpretations of the crisis that drive community responses. Based on the social representations’ theory approach, and specifically relying on the notions of collective symbolic coping and polemical social representations, the study presents 10 country-based case studies of public communication with the aim of exploring the social representations of COVID-19 during the first wave of the outbreak. Multiple communication sources from 10 countries in 5 geo-cultural contexts (Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia, Africa) were selected and analyzed: institutional websites; international/national/local newspapers and news channels; national/international press agencies; and social media platforms. Results highlighted the prevalence of multivocality and polemical social representations, along with outgroup blaming and stigmatization processes, the use of military and naturalistic metaphors, antinomies, and discourse polarization. Implications for effective public communication in crisis management are discussed.

 


DOI Code: 10.1285/i24212113v7i1p13

Keywords: communication; social representations; COVID-19

References


Aim, M. A., Decarsin, T., Bovina, I., & Dany, L. (2018). Health and social representations: A structural approach. Papers on Social Representations, 27(1), 3.1-3.21. http://psr.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/PSR/article/view/460

Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2009). A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00412.x

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1573&context=tqr

Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36, 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0

Brennen J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-Covid-19-misinformation

BusinessTech (2019, October 8). More than half of South Africans are living on less than R41 a day. https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/345026/more-than-half-of-south-africans-are-living-on-less-than-r41-a-day/.

Castelo, U., Larrañaga, M. & Gil de Montes, L. (2020). Trust in care practices in COVID-19 epidemic. Unpublished manuscript.

Chen, K-H. (2010). Asia as method. Toward déimperialization. Duke University Press.

de Rosa, A.S. (2007). From September 11 to the Iraqi War. Shocking Images and the Polarization of Individual and Socially Negotiated Emotions in the Construction of Mass Flashbulb Memory. In S. Gertz, J.-P. Breaux, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Semiotic Rotations: Modes of Meaning in Cultural Worlds (pp.137-168). Charlotte, NV: Information Age Press.

de Rosa, A.S. (2010). Mythe, science et représentations sociales. In D. Jodelet & E. Coelho Paredes (Eds), Pensée mytique et représentations sociale (pp. 85-124). L’Harmattan.

de Rosa, A.S. (2019). For a biography of a theory. In N. Kalampalikis, D. Jodelet, M. Wieviorka, D. Moscovici, & P. Moscovici (Eds.), Serge Moscovici. Un regard sur les mondes communs (pp.155-165). Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.

de Rosa, A.S. (2013). Taking stock: A theory with more than half a century of history. Introduction to: A.S. de Rosa (Ed.), Social Representations in the "social arena” (pp. 1-63). Routledge.

de Rosa, A. S., & Bocci, E. (2013a). Resisting cognitive polyphasia in the social representations of madness. In A.S. de Rosa (Ed.), Social Representations in the "social arena” (pp. 245-310). Routledge,

de Rosa, A. S., & Bocci, E. (2013b) Polemical representations in action in two social movements (No-TAV and Occupy Wall Street): Social change, political arena and controversial relation citizens-community-institutions. 9th European Congress of Community Psychology, Naples, Italy, 6th -9th November 2013. https://www.conftool.com/9eccp2013/index.php?page=browseSessions&presentations=show&abstracts=show&search=de+Rosa

de Rosa, A. S., & Smith, A. (1998). Représentations sociales polémiques et styles d’influence minoritaire, la communication publicitaire de Benetton. Bulletin de Psychologie, 51(4), 436, 399-416.

de Rosa, A. S., Bocci, E., & Dryjanska, L. (2018). The generativity and attractiveness of social representations theory from multiple paradigmatic approaches in various thematic domains: An empirical meta-theoretical analysis on big-data sources from the specialised repository “SoReCom ‘A. S. de Rosa’ @-library”. Papers on Social Representations, 27, 1, 6.1. – 6.35.

de Rosa, A.S., & Mannarini, T. (2020). The “invisible other”: Social representations of Covid-19 pandemic in media and institutional discourse. Papers on Social Representations, 29(2), 5.1-5.35. http://psr.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/PSR/index

de Rosa, A. S., & Mannarini, T. (2021). The Covid-19 as “invisible other” and the socio-spatial distancing within one-meter individual droplet bubble. Urban Design International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00151-z

Eicher, V., & Bangerter, A. (2015). Social representations of infectious diseases. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 385-396). Cambridge University Press.

Emiliani, F., & Palmonari, A. (2019). Repenser la théorie des représentations sociales. Les Editions du Net.

Fanon, F. (1952/1986). Black skin white masks. Pluto Press.

Flick, U. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

Flick, U. Foster, J., & Caillaud, S. (2015). Researching social representations. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 64-82). Cambridge University Press.

Fullman, N., Yearwood, J., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., … Aboyans, V. (2018). Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet, 391(10136), 2236–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30994-2

García-Basteiro, A., Alvarez-Dardet, C., Arenas, A., Bengoa, R., Borrell, C., Del Val, M., ... & Hernández, I. (2020). The need for an independent evaluation of the COVID-19 response in Spain. The Lancet, 396 (10250), 529-530. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31713-X/fulltext

Giacomozzi, A. I., Fiorott, J., & Bertoldo, R. B. (2019). Violence as a result of political polarization: A media social study on Social Representations. In: 7th International seminar: political and economic self-constitution: Media, citizenship activity and political polarization, 2019, Padova. Proceedings of the VII International scientific and practical seminar (pp. 101-106).

Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00376.x

Hatley, B. (2008). Javanese Performances on an Indonesian stages. Contesting culture embracing change. NUS Press.

Hefner, C. J. (1996). Ludruk folk theatre of East Java. Toward a theory of symbolic action. University of Hawai.

Hetherington, M. J. & Weiler, J. D. (2015). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics, still? In J. A. Thurber & A. Yoshinaka (Eds.), American gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of polarization (pp. 86–112). Cambridge University Press.

Jodelet, D. (1989). Les représentations sociales. Presses Universitaire de France

Jodelet, D. (2015). Représentations sociales et mondes de vie. Éd. Des Archives Contemporaines.

Jovchelovitch, J. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. Routledge.

Justo, A. M., Bousfield, A.B., Giacomozzi, A. I., Camargo, B. V. (2020). Communication, Social Representations and Prevention - Information Polarization on COVID-19 in Brazil. Papers on Social Representation, 29(2), 4.1-4.18.

Kalampalikis, N., & Apostolidis, T. (2020). Challenges for social representations theory: The socio-genetic perspective. In S. Papastamou (Ed.). New perspectives in social thinking and social influence. Éditions de la Méditerranée.

Kruglanski, A., Orehek, E., Dechesne, M., & Pierro, A. (2010). Lay epistemic theory: The motivational, cognitive, and social aspects of knowledge formation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00308.x

Larson, H. (2018) The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation, Nature, 562. https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-018-07034-4/d41586-018-07034-4.pdf

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.

Lo Monaco, G. Delouvée, S. & Rateaux, P. (2016). Les représentations sociales. Editions de Boeck.

Lovari, A., D’Ambrosi, L., & Bowen, S.H. (2020). Re-connecting voices. The (new) strategic role of public sector communication after the Covid-19 crisis. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 13(2), 970-989. https/doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i2p970

MacLeod, A. (2014-2015). The impact of communication on human behaviour in times of crisis. Business Continutiy and Emergency Planning, 8(2), 134-40.

Marshall, P. A. (2017) Disinformation society, communication and cosmopolitan democracy. Cosmopolitan Civil Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5477

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Sage.

Moscovici, S. (1961/1976). La psychanalyse son image et son public. Etude sur la répresentation sociale de la psychanalyse. Presses Universitaires de France.

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3) 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303

Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (edited and introduced by Gerard Duveen). Polity Press.

Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representations? In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.). Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 18-61). Blackwell.

Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press.

Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B. & Uzzell, D. (2012). Self-identity threat and resistance to change: Evidence from regular travel behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.008

Nandy, A. (1988). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.

Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N., Idoiaga, N., Dosil, M., & Picaza, M. (2020). Psychological symptoms during the two stages of lockdown in response to the Covid-19 outbreak: An investigation in a sample of citizens in Northern Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01491

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Ltd.

Peacock, J. L. (1968). Rites of modernization: Symbolic and social aspects of Indonesian proletarian drama. University of Chicago Press.

Pop, A. (2012). On the notion of polemical social representations – Theoretical developments and empirical contibutions. http://www.europhd.net/sites/europhd/files/images/onda_2/07/27th_lab/scientific_materials/pop/pop_2012.pdf

Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds) (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sanderson, B. & Meade, D. (2020). Pandemic metaphors: Tracking the narrative. Retrieved from: https://publicinterest.org.uk/part-4-metaphors/.

Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27(187).

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Thornton, S. (2014). Red zone. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/article/red-zone/

Ungar, S. (1998). Hot crises and media reassurance. A Comparison of Emerging Diseases and Ebola Zaire. British Journal of Sociology, 49, 36- 56. https://doi.org/10.2307/591262

Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., & Seifert, F. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602760344241

Washer, P. (2004). Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 2561–2571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.038

World Bank (2017). The World Bank in South Africa. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southafrica/overview.

Van Bavel, J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J. (...) (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.