Self-oriented or visitor-oriented? Exploring the stance of museums online


Abstract


 

Abstract – Websites play a double role in museum communication: on the one hand, they serve as powerful branding tools, through which museums affirm their identity, and, on the other, they are bridging tools, able to reach out to the public and reduce distance with visitors. Both from the perspective of linguists and that of practitioners, little attention has been paid on the interplay of these two dimensions, which defines the quality of the relationship established online with visitors and identifies the museum’s commitment to participation and ethical engagement.

Based on the observation of forty British and American museum websites, the study focusses on the analytical description of the homepage, the showcase par excellence through which museums establish relation with the audience. The methodological toolkit for the analysis relies on a combination of multimodal analysis and discourse analysis techniques. The study lays the foundations for a theoretical distinction between a ‘self-oriented’ and a ‘visitor-oriented’ stance in websites, suggesting that a balance between the two is key to the pursuit of ethical engagement in museum communication.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v56p223

Keywords: museum communication; museum websites; discourse analysis; multimodal analysis; ethical engagement.

References


Bondi, M. 2009. Perspective and Position in Museum Websites. In Radighieri, S. and Tucker, P. (eds) Point of View. Description and Evaluation across Discourses. Rome: Officina Edizioni, pp. 113-127.

Caldwell, N.G. 2000. The Emergence of Museum Brands. In “International Journal of Arts Management” 2[3], pp. 28-34.

Cho, M., and De Moya, M. 2016. Empowerment as a Key Construct for Understanding Corporate Community Engagement. In “International Journal of Strategic Communication” 10[4], pp. 272-288.

Corona, L. 2021. Museums and Communication: The Case of the Louvre Museum at the Covid-19 Age. In “Humanities and Social Science Research” 4[1], pp.15-26.

Dann, G. 1996. The Language of Tourism: a Sociolinguistic Perspective. Wollingford: CAB International.

Frey, B.S. 1998. Superstar Museums: An Economic Analysis. In “Journal of cultural economics” 22[2], pp. 113-125.

Garzone, G. 2007. Genres, Multimodality and the World Wide Web. In Garzone, G., Poncini, G. and Catenaccio, P. (eds.), Multimodality in Corporate Communication. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 15-30.

Gosden, C., Larson, F., and Petch, A. 2007. Knowing Things: Exploring the Collections at the Pitt Rivers Museum, 1884-1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Green, G. M. 2008. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. New York: Routledge.

Huhtamo, E. 2010. On the Origins of the Virtual Museum. In Parry, R. (ed.), Museums in a Digital Age, New York: Routledge, pp. 121-135.

Kidd, J. 2018. Digital Media Ethics and Museum Communication. In Drotner, K., Dziekan, V. and Parry, R. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Museums, Media and Communication, New York: Routledge, pp. 193-204.

Klingmann, A. 2007. Brandscapes: Architecture in the Experience Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Kress, G.R., and van Leeuwen, T. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.

Levinson, S.C. 2004. Deixis. In Horn, L.R., and Ward, G.L. (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 97 -115.

Marty, P.F. 2007. Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Before and After the Museum Visit. In “Museum Management and Curatorship” 22[4], pp. 337-360.

Marty, P.F. 2008. Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Digital Museum Resources and their Use. In “Museum Management and Curatorship” 23[1], pp. 81-99.

Marty, P.F. 2011. My Lost Museum: User Expectations and Motivations for Creating Personal Digital Collections on Museum Websites. In “Library and information science research” 33[3], pp. 211-219.

Mathur, S. 2005. Social Thought and Commentary: Museums Globalization. In “Anthropological Quarterly” 78[3], pp. 697-708.

McLean, F.C. 1993. Marketing in Museums: a Contextual Analysis. Museum Management and Curatorship, 12[1], pp. 11-27.

McLean, F. C. 2012. Marketing the Museum. New York: Routledge.

Pierroux, P. and S. Skjulstad. 2011. Composing a Public Image Online: Art Museums and Narratives of Architecture in Web Meditation. In “Computers and Composition” 28, pp. 205-214.

Purser, E.R. 2000. Telling Stories: Text Analysis in a Museum. In Ventola, E. (ed.) Discourse and Community: Doing Functional Linguistics. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 169-198.

Ravelli, L. 2006. Museum Texts: Communication Frameworks. London: Routledge.

Serrell, B. 2015. Exhibit Labels: an Interpretative Approach. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Sezzi, A. 2019. Go on an Art Adventure: Popularizing Art for Children through Museum Websites. In Bondi, M., Cacchiani, S. and Cavalieri, S. (eds.) Communicating Specialized Knowledge: Old Genres and New Media, pp. 162 - 175.

Soren, B.J. 2009. Museum Experiences that Change Visitors. In “Museum Management and Curatorship” 24[3], pp. 233-251.

Steiner, D. 2000. Is it a Cathedral, a Museum or a Shop? In Castle, H. (ed.), Architectural Design, 70[3], pp. 20-23

Taylor, M. and Kent, M.L. 2014. Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. In “Journal of public relations research” 26[5], pp. 384-398.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.