“Due to Heightened Risk”: Qualifying Risk in the Debate over Covid-19


Abstract


Our paper presents an analysis of the conceptualisation and framing of ‘risk’ in the Covid-19 pandemic. We investigate all occurrences of risk-based vocabulary in two corpora dealing with the spread and the political/social/economic consequences of Covid19 from February 2020 to February 2021 (i.e. the InterDiplo Covid-19 corpus and the CORD-19 corpus). We apply a mixed-method approach to show how the concept of ‘risk’ is lexically qualified in the public communication of a hot issue such as the pandemic. Therefore, after a first recognition of all related expressions of the nominal realization of “risk” in the worldlists of the two corpora, we investigate their concordances to find typical collocations and phraseology used to qualify risk in Covid-19 epidemic. Our results show a clear tendency towards a negative thematisation of “risk” which is characterized by patterns highlighting uncertainty and fear in the fight against a disease spreading on an unprecedented scale and posing total threats that not only involve individuals but affect humanity globally. The focus on the phraseology around the lexical elements helps reconstruct communicative functions and approaches that characterize the two discursive contexts.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v52p45

Keywords: risk communication; corpus linguistics; phraseology; collocations; Covid-19

References


Baker, P. 2006, Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum, London / New York

Battistelli, F. and M.G. Galantino 2019. Dangers, Risks and Threats: An Alternative Conceptualization to the Catch-All Concept of Risk, in “Current Sociology” 67 (1), pp. 64–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118793675.

Bernard, N. R., Basit, A., Sofija, E., Phung, H., Lee, J., Rutherford, S. and N. Wiseman 2021, Analysis of Crisis Communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic, in “International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction” 62, 102375.

Boholm, M. 2009, Risk and Causality in Newspaper Reporting, in “Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis” 29 (11), pp. 1566–1577.

Boholm, M. 2012, The Semantic Distinction between “Risk” and “Danger”: A Linguistic Analysis, in “Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis” 32 (2), pp. 281–293.

Boholm, M. 2016, Risk Association: Towards a Linguistically Informed Framework for Analysing Risk in Discourse, in “Journal of Risk Research” 21 (4), pp. 480–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1223158

Boholm, M., N. Möller and S. O. Hansson 2016, The Concepts of Risk, Safety, and Security: Applications in Everyday Language, in “Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis” 36 (2), pp. 320–338.

Candlin, C. N., J. Crichton and A.S. Firkins 2016, Crucial Sites and Research Orientations: Exploring the Communication of Risk, in Crichton J., C.N. Candlin and A.S. Firkins (eds.), Communicating Risk, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1-14.

COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19). 2020. Version 2020-05-02. Retrieved from https://pages.semanticscholar.org/coronavirus-research. Accessed 2020-05-02. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3715505

DePaula, N., Hagen, L., Roytman, S., Dyson, D., Alnahass, D., Patel, M. and A. Hill 2022, A Framework of Social Media Messages for Crisis and Risk Communication: A Study of the Covid-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Fillmore, C.J. and B. T. Atkins 1992, Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors, in Lehrer A. and E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organisation, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, pp. 75-102.

de Las Heras-Pedrosa, C., P. Sánchez-Núñez, and J.I.Peláez 2020, Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Understanding during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain and its impact on Digital Ecosystems, in “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health” 17(15), pp. 5542.

Dyer, J., and B. Kolic 2020, Public Risk Perception and Emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 Pandemic, in “Applied Network Science” 5 (1), pp. 1-32.

Galantino , M.G. 2020, The Migration-Terrorism Nexus: An Analysis of German and Italian Press Coverage of the ‘Refugee Crisis’, in “European Journal of Criminology” 10, pp. 1-23. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1477370819896213

Giddens, A. 1998, Risk Society: The Context of British Politics, in Franklin, J. (ed.), Politics of Risk Society, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 23-24.

Hamilton, C., S. Adolphs and B. Nerlich 2007, The Meanings of ‘Risk’: A View from Corpus Linguistics, in “Discourse & Society” 18 (2), pp. 163–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073374.

Hardy, D.E. and C.B. Colombini 2011, A Genre, Collocational, and Constructional Analysis of RISK, in “International Journal of Corpus Linguistics” 16 (4), pp. 462—485. doi 10.1075/ijcl.16.4.02

Hunston, S. and H. Su 2019, Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’, in “Applied Linguistics” 40 (4), pp. 567–593, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx046

Hyland, K. and K. Jiang 2021, Competition and the Hyping of Virus Research, in “International Journal of Corpus Linguistics” 26 (4), pp. 444-468.

Luhmann, N. 1993, Risk: A Sociological Theory, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

Müller, M. 2017, Digital Discourse Analysis. LitLab Pamphlete #5. Online publication: https://www.digitalhumanitiescooperation.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/p05_mueller_eng.pdf (Last accessed on March 13 2022)

Müller, M. and R.M. Mell 2022, ‘Risk’ in Political Discourse. A Corpus Approach to Semantic Change in German Bundestag Debates, in “Journal of Risk Research” 25 (3), pp. 1-16.

Müller, M. and J. Stegmeier 2019, Investigating Risk, Uncertainty and Normativity within the Framework of Digital Discourse Analysis. The Example of Future Technologies in Climate Change Discourse, in Olofsson A. and J.O. Zinn (eds.), Researching Risk and Uncertainty – Methodologies, Methods and Research Strategies, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 309-355.

Müller, M., S. Bartsch and J. O. Zinn 2021, Communicating the Unknown. An Interdisciplinary Annotation Study of Uncertainty in the Coronavirus Pandemic, in “International Journal of Corpus Linguistics” 26 (4), pp. 498–531. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21096.mul.

Rothstein, H., D. Demeritt, R. Paul and L. Wang 2022, True to Type? How Governance Traditions Shaped Responses to Covid-19 in China, Germany, UK and USA, in Brown P. and J. Zinn (eds.), Covid-19 across 6 Continents – Social Challenges, Responses and Consequences, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham Switzerland.

Semino, E. 2021, “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19, in “Health Communication” 36 (1), pp. 50—58. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989

Sinclair, J. 2004, Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse, Routledge, London.

Taylor, C. and A. Marchi 2018, Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review, Routledge, London

WHO (World Health Organisation). 2017. Communicating Risk in Public Health Emergencies. A WHO Guideline for Emergency Risk Communication (ERC) Policy and Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Wicke P. and M. M. Bolognesi 2021, Covid-19 Discourse on Twitter: How the Topics, Sentiments, Subjectivity, and Figurative Frames Changed Over Time, in “Frontiers in Communication” 6, Article 651997 DOI=10.3389/fcomm.2021.651997

Zhang, L., H. Li and K. Chen 2020, Effective Risk Communication for Public Health Emergency: Reflections on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in Wuhan, China, in “Healthcare” 8 (1), p. 64.

Zinn, J.O 2010, Risk as Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, in “Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines” 4 (2), pp. 106-124.

Zinn, J.O. and D. McDonald 2018, Risk in the New York Times (1987–2014). A Corpus-Based Exploration of Sociological Theories, Palgrave, London.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.