Strategie di engagement nella didattica universitaria della lingua straniera
Abstract
Abstract – The article presents a case study of engagement strategies in university foreign language teaching and learning. A number of communicative (cooperation, interdependence, time management) and emotional (inquiry-project-based learning and climax) engagement tools are illustrated and their integrated effect through observer-participants is reported. The concluding reflection supports the need to create learning environments that are coherent and akin to a pedagogical paradigm that is aware of the connection between the methodologies employed and interpersonal relationships.
References
Ädel, Annelie. “Rapport building in student group work.” Journal of pragmatics, no. 43, 2011, pp. 2932-2947.
Ansarian, Loghman, Lin, Teoh Mei. Problem-based language learning and teaching. Springer, 2018.
Biggs, John, Tang, Catherine. Teaching for quality learning at University. Open University Press, 2007.
Bohle Carbonell, Katerina et al. “Problem-based learning in hybrid, blended, or online courses: Instructional and change management implications for supporting learner engagement.” Increasing students engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies, a cura di Charles Wankel, Patrick Blessinger, Emerald, 2013, pp. 359-386.
Brookhart, Susan. Assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD, 2010.
Chu, Kai Wah Samuel et al. 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Springer, 2017.
Coffman, Teresa. Engaging students through inquiry-oriented learning and technology. Rowan and Littlefield Education, 2009.
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. “On emotions in foreign language learning and use.” The language teacher, vol. 39, no. 3, 2015, pp. 13-15.
Dewey John. Come pensiamo. Raffello Cortina Editore, 2019 [ed. or. 1933].
Dörnyei, Zoltán, Murphey, Tim. Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Dörnyei, Zoltán, Ryan, Stephen. The psychology of the second language learner revisited. Routledge, 2015.
Fratter, Ivana, Fratter, Nadia. Dinamica di gruppo per lo sviluppo delle life skills. Cleup Sc., 2000.
Hampel, Regine. “Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course.” Task-based language learning and teaching with technology, a cura di Michael Thomas, Hayo Reinders, Continuum, 2010, pp. 131-153.
Hew, Khe Foon, Cheung, Wing Sum. Student participation in online discussions. Springer, 2012.
Hine, Christine. “Ethnographies of online communities and social media: modes, varieties, affordances.” The SAGE handbook of online research methods, a cura di Nigel Fielding, Raymond Lee, Grant Blank, Sage, 2017, pp. 401-415.
Landone, Elena. Utopia didattica: l’apprendimento della lingua straniera oltre l’aula. Mimesis, 2018.
Larsen-Freeman, D., Cameron, L., 2008, Complex systems and applied linguistics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., 2011, A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition, in D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, Abingdon, Routledge: 48-72.
Lave, Jean. “The practice of learning.” Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, a cura di Seth Chaiklin, Jean Lave, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 3–32.
Leat, David. “Why we need enquiry and project based learning.” Enquiry and project based learning, a cura di Leat David, Routledge, 2017, s.p.
Littlefield, Cara. “The importance of audience in project based learning.” Enquiry and project based learning, a cura di Leat David, Routledge, 2017, s.p.
Long, Mike. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell, 2015.
Miyake, Naomi, “Computer supported collaborative learning.” The SAGE handbook of e-learning research, a cura di Richard Andrews, Caroline Haythornthwaite, Sage, 2007, pp. 248-265.
Nunan, David. Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 2004
QCER – Volume complementare 2020. Quadro comune europeo di riferimento per le lingue: apprendimento, insegnamento, valutazione. Volume complementare (Traduzione italiana di Monica Barsi, Edoardo Lugarini e Anna Cardinaletti). Consiglio d’Europa, 2020.
Reidsema, Carl, Hadgraft, Roger, Kavanagh, Lydia. “Introduction to the flipped classroom.” The flipped classroom, a cura di Carl Reidsema et al. Springer, 2017, pp. 3-14.
Schrooten, Walter. “Task-based language teaching and ICT: developing and assessing interactive multimedia for task-based language teaching.” Task-based language education: From theory to practice, a cura di Kris Van den Branden, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 129-150.
Sharples, Mike, Taylor, Josie, Vavolua, Giasemi. “A theory of learning for the mobile age.” The SAGE handbook of e-learning research, a cura di Richard Andrews, Caroline Haythornthwaite, Sage, 2007, pp. 221-247.
Starr-Glass, David. “From connectivity to connected learners: Transactional distance and social presence.” Increasing students engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies, a cura di Charles Wankel, Patrick Blessinger, Emerald, 2013, pp. 113-143.
Tan, Oon-Seng. Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Cengage Learning, 2003.
Vygotsky, Lev, Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, 1978.
Watson-Gegeo, Karen Ann. “Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA.” The modern language journal, vol. 88, no. iii, 2004, pp. 331-350.
Willis, Jane. A framework for task-based learning. Longman, 1996.
Xolocotzin, Ulises, Chloe Shu-Hua, Yeh, Sibel, Erduran. “Emotional modulation of perspective taking: Implications for computer-supported argumentation.” Emotions, technology, and behaviors, a cura di Sharon Tettegah, Dorothy Espelage, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 3-20.
Zimmerman, Barry, Sebastian, Bonner, Robert, Kovach, Developing self-regulated learners. American Psychology Association, 1996.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.