From disciplinary approaches toward transdisciplinary perspectives: Conceptual and political frameworks of Community Psychology in Europe


Abstract


Community Psychology in this paper is analyzed as a system´s view towards global and local challenges. Based on the rich body of disciplinary knowledge and skills, transdisciplinary potentials and perspectives of community psychology will be outlined. The paper follows a line of arguments that community psychology has the option to play an important role to help to design a civil society based on trust, mutual support and individual and collective empowerment. Community psychology beyond disciplinary approaches has the potential for a new transdisciplinary science desperately needed to build the civil society of the future.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i24212113v5i1p56

Keywords: community psychology, linking science, tacit knowing,

References


Adorno, T. W. & Horkheimer, M. (1997). The Dialectics of Enlightenment. Brooklyn: Verso Books

Alexander, C.; Ishikawa, S. & Silverstein, S. (1977). A Pattern Language. Towns, Buildings, Constructions. Oxford University Press

Alinsky, S. (1989). Rules for Radicals. Chicago: Vintage Books

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well . San Francisco, CA: Routledge.

Arcidiacono, C. (2012). Reflections and Actions in Community Psychology. Bulletin of the European Community Psychology Association, Issue 1, 2012

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1989). Participatory Action research and Action Science Compared. American Behavioral Scientist 32: pp. 612–23.

Basaglia, F. (1968). L´ístituzione negata. Rapporto da un ospedale psichiatrico. Milano: Guilio Einaudi

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press

Beck, U. (2005). Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. New York: Blackwell

Bloom, B. (1973). Community Mental Health. Morristown: Brooks&Cole Publ

Bradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE Handbook for Action Research. London: Sage

Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. New York: Blackwell

Cohen, L.; Dean, J.; Gridley, H.; Hogea, R.; Robinson, K.; Sampson, E.; Sibbel, A. & Turner, C. (2012). Lobbying for Endorsement of Community Psychology in Australia. Australian Psychological Society College of Community Psychologists. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 4, 2012

Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi

Dominelli, L. (1999). Community, Citizenship and Empowerment, Sociology May 1999 33: 441-446

Fals Borda, O. (1991). Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly With Participatory Action-Research. Apex Press

Francescato, D. (2017). A critical look at globalization processes and at the internationalization of community psychology. In M. Bond, C. Keys & I. Serrano-Garcia (Eds.), APA Handbook of Community Psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 485–501). Washington D.C.: APA.

Francescato, D. (2018): Globalization, artificial intelligence, social networks and political polarization: New challenges for community psychologists. In: Community Psychology in Global Perspective, Vol 4 (1), 20-41

Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Education

Frese, M. (2006). What if Applied Psychology Mattered to the World? Key-note-adress to the Congress of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP) in Athens, Greece

Gabriel, R. (2002). Writer´s Workshops and the Work to Make Things. San Francisco: Addison-Wesley

Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World. London: Routledge

Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press

Harari, Y.N. (2017). Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York: Vintage

Hart, S. (2007). Capitalism at the Crossroads. Aligning Earth, Business, and Humanity. Wharton School Publications

Jahoda, M. (1972). Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community. Tavistock: Taylor & Francis

Kindon, S.L., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds) (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Places. Routledge UK

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-network theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005

McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.

Nelson, G. & Prilleltensky, I. (2004). Community Psychology. In Pursuit of Liberation and Well-Being. Palgrave

Rappaport, J. (1977). Community Psychology. Values, Research, and Action. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston

Rappaport, J.; Swift, C. & Hess, R. (eds.). (1984). Studies in Empowerment: Steps Toward Understanding and Action. Haworth Press

Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (eds) (2008). The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, CA.

Sarason, S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the Future as it Emerges. Boston, Mass.: Society for Organizational Learning

Schuler, D. (2008). Liberating Voices. A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday

Sherman, F. & Torbert, W. (2000). Transforming Social Inquiry, Transforming Social Action. New York: Springer Science & Business

Stark, W. (1996). Empowerment. New Concepts for Action in the Psychosocial Arena. Lambertus, Freiburg

Stark, W. (2011). Community psychology as a linking science: Potentials and challenges for transdisciplinary competences. In F. H. Almeida Acosta (Ed.), International community psychology. Community approaches to contemporary social problems (pp. 130–143). Puebla, Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla.

Stark, W. (2012): Tacit Knowledge and Innovation Patterns in Communities and Social Systems: Using Jazz Patterns as Key to Understand Innovative Processes. In: Neis, H.; Brown, G.; Gurr, J. & Schmidt, A. (eds): Generative Process, Patterns, and the Urban Challenge. PUARL, Portland (Wash.)

Stark, W. (2015): Performative Pattern Languages and the Improvisational Field. In: The Workshop. Pursuit of Pattern Languages for Societal Change. Donau Universität Krems (A)

Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research. Am. J. Comm. Psych., 38, (1-2), 63-77

Tomai, M; Rosa, V.; Mebane, M.E.; D'Acunti, A.; Benedetti, L; Francescato, D. (2010). Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students. Computers & Education 54(1): 265-274

Wildemeersch, D. & Stroobants, V. (2003). Connections. Active Citizenship and Multiple Identities. Leuven

Wolff, T. (2006). SCRA Proposes New Core Principles Including Vision Statement. The Community Psychologist, 2006, p. 76-78.

Yunus, M. (2008). A World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism; Public Affairs.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.