A Safe Space Behind Revolving Doors: Opportunity Structures and the Multiple Layers of LGBTQ+ Business-Based Activism in a Hostile State


Abstract


Despite LGBTQ+ employee resource groups having become a commonly recognized initiative in Slovakia, research conducted within these groups in the Central and Eastern European region so far has been lacking. Existing literature from the Global North indicates that the groups and their members aim for a great diversity of objectives. We propose to study LGBTQ+ employee resource groups not only as business-based initiatives driven by human resources development, but also as collective actions within the theoretical framework of modern social movements that emphasize opportunity structures and movement resources. The present case study sheds light on the different levels of objectives aimed at by employee resource groups' members, as they operate in specific organizational environments as well as in a country with widespread hetero/cis-sexism and growing political hostility. The case study indicates that it is the ability to operate at two institutional levels of opportunity structures that allows these groups to mitigate the costs of activism while at the same time allowing their engagement with the LGBTQ+ civil society in the country.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v17i2p385

Keywords: activism; employee resource groups; LGBTQ+; social movements; workplace

References


Ahmed, S. (2017), Living a feminist life, Durham: Duke University Press.

Bernstein, M. (2009), “25 The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement”, in Goodwin, J. and J.M. Jasper (eds.), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 260-264

Braun, V., and V. Clarke (2019), “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis”, Qualitative Research in Sport, exercise and health,11(4): 589-597

Briscoe, F., and S. Safford (2010), “Employee affinity groups: Their evolution from social movement vehicles to employer strategies”, Perspectives on Work, 14(1): 42-45

Burchiellaro, O. (2023), The Gentrification of Queer Activism - Diversity Politics and the Promise of Inclusion in London, Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Buechler, S.M. (1995), “New Social Movement Theories”, The Sociological Quarterly, 36(3): 441-464

Colgan, F., and A. McKearney (2012), “Visibility and voice in organisations: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered employee networks”, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 31(4): 359-378

De Bakker, F. G., Den Hond, F., King, B., & K. Weber (2013), “Social Movements, Civil Society and Corporations: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead”, Organization Studies, 34(5-6): 573-593

Drucker, P. (2015), Warped: Gay Normality and Queer Anti-Capitalism, Leiden: Brill.

Duggan, L. (2004), The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy, Boston: Beacon Press.

Fleming, P. (2009), Authenticity and the cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flesher Fominaya, C.F. (2020), Social Movements in a Globalized World, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fraser, N. (1997). Heterosexism, Misrecognition, and Capitalism: A Response to Judith Butler. Social Text, 52/53, 279–289

Githens, R.P. (2009), “Capitalism, identity politics, and queerness converge: LGBT employee resource groups”, New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 23(3): 18-31

Githens, R.P., and S.R. Aragon (2009), “LGBT employee groups: Goals and organizational structures”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(1): 121-135

Guasti, P., and L. Bustikova (2020), “In Europe’s closet: The rights of sexual minorities in the Czech Republic and Slovakia”, East European Politics, 36(2): 226-246

Habermas, J. (1981), “New Social Movements”, Telos (49): 33-37

Hunt, S.A., and R.A. Benford (2004), “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment”, in D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 433-457.

ILGA Europe (2021), Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved April 7, 2023 (https://ilga-europe.org/report/annual-review-2021/ )

ILGA Europe (2022), The Frontline: Working Alongside Businesses to Shift Attitudes. Retrieved April 7, 2023 (https://www.ilga-europe.org/podcast/working-alongside-businesses-to-shift-attitudes/)

Maďarová, Z. (2015), “Love and fear argumentative strategies against gender equality in Slovakia”, in Anti-gender movements on the rise, Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation, pp. 33-42

McFadden, C., and M. Crowley-Henry (2018), “‘My People’: the potential of LGBT employee networks in reducing stigmatization and providing voice”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5): 1056-1081

McNulty, Y., McPhail, R., Inversi, C., Dundon, T., and E. Nechanska (2018), “Employee voice mechanisms for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender expatriation: the role of Employee-Resource Groups (ERGs) and allies”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5): 829-856

Melucci, A. (1985), “The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements”, Social research, 52(4): 789-816

Perlov, G., Udi, K., Arnall, D., and J. Miller (2023), The Economic Case for LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Slovakia. Retrieved January 10, 2024 (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bba53a8ab1a62771504d1dd/t/656ccbaa78220175ba1949cd/1701628858766/OFB+Slovakia+Report+2023+%5BEN%5D.pdf).

Pew Research Center (2018), Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues. Retrieved April 28, 2023

(https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/10/29/eastern-and-western-europeans-differ-on-importance-of-religion-views-of-minorities-and-key-social-issues/)

Raeburn, N.C. (2004), Changing corporate America from inside out: Lesbian and gay workplace rights, Minneapolis (Minnesota): University of Minnesota Press.

Rose, N. (1999), Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, London: Free Association Books.

Schadendorf, J. (2021), GaYme Changer: How the LGBT+ community and their allies are changing the global economy, London: LID Publishing.

Schneiberg, M., and M. Lounsbury (2008), “Social Movements and Institutional Analysis”, in R.Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, New York: SAGE, pp. 650-672

Soule, S.A. (2012), “Targeting Organizations: Private and Contentious Politics, Research In The Sociology Of Organizations, 34/2012: 261-285

Soule, S.A., and B. King (2015), “Markets, Business, and Social Movements”, in D. della Porta, and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 696-708.

Smrek, M. (2015), The failed Slovak referendum on “family”: Voters’ apathy and minority rights in central Europe. Retrieved April 7, 2023 (https://balticworlds.com/the-failed-slovak-referendum-on-%E2%80%9Cfamily%E2%80%9D/)

Taylor, V., and N.C. Raeburn (1995), “Identity politics as high-risk activism: Career consequences for lesbian, gay, and bisexual sociologists”, Social Problems, 42(2): 252-273

Thomas, D. A., and Ely, R. J. (1996), “Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity“, Harvard Business Review, 74(5): 79-90

Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow (2015), Contentious Politics (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tripathi, S., Radcliffe, C., and F. Houdart (2017), Tackling Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans, & Intersex People / Standards of Conduct for Business. Retrieved January 10, 2024 (https://www.unfe.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/UN-Standards-of-Conduct.pdf).

Welbourne, T.M., S. Rolf, and S. Schlachter (2017), “The case for employee resource groups: A review and social identity theory-based research agenda”, Personnel Review, 46(8): 1816-1834

Wulff, S., M. Bernstein, and V. Taylor (2015), “New Theoretical Directions from the Study of Gender and Sexuality Movements: Collective Identity, Multi-Institutional Politics, and Emotions”, in D. della Porta, and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108-130.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.