The technocratic reason in the government of emergency. A theoretical analysis on the management of the Covid-19 epidemic

doi:10.1285/i20356609v15i3p761

The technocratic reason in the government of emergency. A theoretical analysis on the management of the Covid-19 epidemic

Emilio Gardini

Abstract

The assumption on which this contribution is based that in liberal democracies the "political space" represents the confrontational space of coexistence in which lives are governed by "legitimate" power of politics. What we have observed over the course of about two years now is that the epidemic must be understood within this space and, as happens for the observation of all "social facts", it cannot be considered as an isolated phenomenon. The history of epidemics is therefore mainly a "social and political history"; just think of the way in which the use of measures to counter the contagion redesigns the meaning of coexistence and power relations. The Covid-19 epidemic comes at the end of an economic crisis that began in 2008 and should not be disconnected from this, despite the tendency in public opinion and the media to consider it an "external factor", exclusively a health issue relating above all to "vital processes". Therefore, this contribution intends to propose an examination of the "government of the emergency" in liberal, capitalist, de-collectivized societies through a theoretical approach (biopolitical and dialectical) which, on the one hand, investigates the relationship between government, power and contagion control devices and, on the other hand, explores the presuppositions of the crisis of knowledge that increasingly gives way to "technique" which becomes an administrative tool.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v15i3p761

Keywords: Liberal democracy; health government; biopolitics; technocracy; dialectical thought

References

Agamben G. (1998) [1995], Homo Sacer, Sovereign Power and Bare Life: Stanford Univ. Press, 1998

Balibar E. (2015) [2012], Citizenship, Cambridge: Politity Press.

Bickerton C.J., Invernizzi Accetti C. (2021), Technopopulism. The new logic of democratic politics, UK: Oxford University Press

Bloch E. (1968), Über Karl Marx, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Blume S. (2006), “Anti-vaccination movement and their interpretations”, Social Science & medicine 62, 3: 628-642.

Blume S. (2017), Immunization. How Vaccines became Controversial, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Bobbio B. (2006) [1985], Liberalismo e democrazia, Milano, Simonelli.

Bourdieu P. (1997), Méditations Pascalienne, Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1997.

Braun B. (2021), Central bank planning for public purpose in D. Fassin and M. Fourcade (eds.) Pandemic exposures. Economy and society in the time of Coronavirus, Chicago: Hau Books.

Brossat A. (2003), La démocratie immunitaire, Paris: La Dispute.

Bucchi M. (2009) [2006], Beyond technocracy. Science, politics and citizens, London-NY:Springer

Campesi G. (2009), Genealogia della pubblica sicurezza. Teoria e storia del moderno dispositivo poliziesco, Verona: Ombre Corte.

Canetti E. (1962) [1960], Crowds and power, New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.

Carrer M. (2021), “Comunicazione e propaganda nl governo Conte II allo scoppio dell’emergenza sanitaria da Covid-19”, Queste istituzioni. N. 1: 150-189

Caselli D. (2020), Esperti. Come studiarli e perché. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Carrol P. E. (2002), “Medical police and the history of public health”, Medical History, 46, pp. 461-494.

Castel R. (1995), Les Métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat, Paris: Fayard.

Castel R. (2003), L’insécurité sociale. Qu’est-ce qu’être protégé?, Paris: Editions du Seiul.

Centeno M. (1993), “The New Leviathan. The dynamics and limits of technocracy”, Theory and society, 22: 307-335.

Comte A., (1967) [1830-1842], Corso di filosofia positiva Vol I, Torino: Utet.

Corbin A. (1983) [1982], Storia sociale degli odori. XVIII e XIV secolo, Milano: Mondadori.

Durbach N. (2005), Bodily matters. The anti-vaccination moviment in England, 1853-1907, Durham: Duke University Press.

Durkheim É. (1982) [1895], The rules of sociological method, USA: The Free Press.

Durkheim É. (1897-1898), “Morphologie sociale”, Année Sociologique, N. 2.

Esmark A. (2017), The technocratic take-over of democracy: connectivity, reflexivity and accountability. (paper presented for ICPP 2017 Singapore)

Esmark A. (2020), The new technocracy, Great Britain: Bristol University Press

Esposito R. (2008) [2004], Bíos, biopolitcs and philosophy, Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press.

Esposito R. (2011) [2002], Immunitas. The protection and Negation of life, Polity Press.

Esposito R. (2022), Immunità commune. Biopolitica all’epoca della pandemia, Torino: Einaudi.

Ewald F. (1986), “Bio-power”, History of the present, N. 2, 8-9.

Fassin D. (2021), The moral Economy of Life in the Pandemic in D. Fassin and M. Fourcade (eds.) Pandemic exposures. Economy and society in the time of Coronavirus, Chicago: Hau Books.

Fassin D. (2017), La vie. Mode d’emploi critique, Berlin: Surkamp Verlag.

Fehér F., Heller A. (1994), Biopolitics. Aldershot: Avebury.

Fisher F. (1990), Technocracy and the politics of expertise, USA: Sage.

Foucault (2004), Sécurité, territorie, population, Cours au Collége da France 1977-1978, Paris: Editions de Seuill/Galimard.

Foucault M. (2003) [1963], The birth of clinic, London: Routledge.

Foucault M. (1978) [1976], The History of sexuality. Vol. 1. An introduction, New York: Pantheon Books

Foucault M (1994) [1977], El poder, una bestia magnifica, interview with M. Osorio, in “Quadernos para el dialogo”, 238, now in Dits et Écrits, 1954-1988 in D. Defert, F. Ewald, J. Lagrange (eds.), Paris: Gallimard, vol. 3.

Foucault M. (2003) [1997], Society must be defended. Lectures at Collége de France 1975-76. New York. Picador.

Foucault M. (1979), Omnes et Singulatim: Towards a Criticism of “Political Reason”, S. Mc Murrin (edited by), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Salt Lake City: University of Utha Press, 1981, pp. 223-254.

Foucault M. (1975), Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison, Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault M. (2009) [2004], Security, territory, population. Lectures at Collége de France 1977-78, Great Britain: Palgrave MacMillan

Fodére F. E. (1830), Trattato di Medicina legale e d’Igiene pubblica o di Polizia di Sanità, Napoli, Tipografia della Minerva, 1830, Tomo 7.

Gardini E. (2020), “Salute pubblica, libertà individuale, controllo sociale. Le vaccinazioni obbligatorie in Italia”, Salute e società, XIX, 2/2020: 149-163.

Gobo G., Sena B. (2019), “Oltre la polarizzazione “pro-vax” versus “no-vax”. Atteggiamenti e motivazioni nel dibattito italiano sulle vaccinazioni”, Salute e società, 2/2018: 176-190.

Heller A. (1996), “Has biopolitics changed the concept of political” in Heller A. and Puntscher Reickman S. Biopolitics. The politics of body, race and nature. Aldershot: Avebury

Heller A. (2003), Biopolitica e modernità in Cedroni L., Chiantera Sutte P. (eds). Questioni di biopolitica. Roma: Bulzoni.

Hell J. (2007), “Biopolitics and Gender Studies.” In János Boros and Mihály Vajda (eds) Ethics and Heritage: Essays on the Philosophy of Agnes Heller, Pécs: Brambauer.

Hobhouse L. T. (1945) [1911], Liberalism, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.

Horkheimer M. (2004) [1947], Eclipse of reason, London – New York: Continuum.

Horkheimer M., Adorno T. (2002) [1947], Dialectic of enlightenment, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Horton R. (2020), Covid is not a pandemic, The Lancet. 396: p. 874.

Horton S. (2021), “When the face becomes a carrier: biopower, Levinas’s ethics and contagion”, Revista portuguesa de filosofia, Vol. 77 (2-3): 715-732.

Kosík K. (1976), Dialectics of the concrete. A study of problems of man and world. Dordrecht (Holland) Boston (USA): Reidel Publishing Company.

Le Goff J.; Truong N. (2003), Un histoire du corps au Moyen Âge, Paris: Liana Levi.

Lemke T. (2011), Biopolitics. An advanced introduction, New York and London: New York University Press.

Lorenzini D. (2021), “Biopolitcs in the time of Coronavirus”, Critical Inquiry, 47: 40-45

Marcuse H. (1982) [1878], A note on dialectic, in Arato A. and Gebhartd E., (eds), The essential Frankfurt school reader, New York: Continuum.

Marcuse H. (1964), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Usa : Beacon Press.

Marcuse H. (1941), “Some social implication of modern technology”, Studies in philosophy and social science, vol IX, n. 3: 414-439.

Marx K. (1976) [1843], Critica della filosofia hegeliana del diritto in Marx Engels Opere, Vol. III, Roma: Editori Riuniti.

Marx K. (1844), On The Jewish Question. First Published: February, 1844 in Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher; Proofed and Corrected: by Andy Blunden, Matthew Grant and Matthew Carmody, 2008/9, Mark Harris 2010.

Martini L. (1834), Polizia Medica, Capolago: Tipografia e libreria Elvetica.

McKeown T. (1976), The modern rise of population, London: Edward Arnold Publisher.

Milanovic B. (2019), Capitalism, alone. The future of the system that rules the world. Cambridge Massachusetts-London, England: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

Neocleous M. (1998), “Policing and pin‐making: Adam smith, police and the state of prosperity”, Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, Vol. 8, 425-449.

Neocleous M. (2000), The fabrication of social order. A critical theory of police power, London: Pluto Press.

Neocleous M. (2022), The Politics of Immunity. Security and the Policing of Bodies, New York: Verso.

Olson R. G. (2016), Scientism and technocracy in the twentieth century. The legacy of scientific management, London:Lexington Books.

Pellizzoni L., Sena B. (2021), “Preparedness as Governmentality. Probing the Italian Management of the Covid-19 Emergency”, Sociologica, V.15, N13: 61-83.

Porter D., Porter R. (1988), “The politics of prevention: anti-vaccinationism and public health in nineteenth-century England”: Medical History, 32: 231-252.

Rosen G. (1974), From Medical Police to Social Medicine: Essays on the History of Health Care, New York: Science History Publications.

Rosen G. (1958), A History of Public Health, New York: MD Publications.

Rosen G. (1953), “Cameralism and the concept of medical police”, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol 27, N. 21, pp. 21-42.

Rullo L. (2021) “The Covid-19 pandemic crisis and the personalization of the government in Italy”, International journal of public leadership. Vol. 17, No. 2: 196-207

Szendy P. (2021), Viral Times, Critical inquiry. 27: 63-67.

Schmitt C. (1985) [1922], Political Theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, Chicago-London: Chcago University Press.

Simmel, G. (1908), Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung: Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Supiot A. (2005), Homo Juridicus, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Supiot A. (2021), “Foucault’s mistake”, New Left Rewiev, 132, Nov/Dec.

Urbinati N. (2022), “Tecnopopulismo e scenari futuri”, La Fionda. Tecnopolitica. Dal momento populista al governo dell’emergenza. N. 1/2022: 235-247.

von Hayek F. (1978), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Windholz E. L. (2020), “Governing in a pandemic: from parliamentary sovereignty to autocratic technocracy”, The theory and practice of legislation, Vol. 8, Nos. 1-2: 93-113

Wallerstein I. (2006) [2004], World-System analysis. An introduction, USA: Duke University Press.

Wolfe R. M., Sharp L. K. (2002), “Anti-vaccinationists past and present”, British Medical Journal, 325: 430-43.

Žižek S. (2012), Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism, New York: Verso Books.

Žižek S. (1993), Tarrying with the Negative. Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology, Durham: Duke University press.

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

کاغذ a4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.

Username
Password
Remember me