Covid-19 Pandemic and the Fiscal Strategy of the International Monetary Fund: Towards New Directions in the Global Political Economy?


Abstract


This article seeks to contribute to the analyses of the impact of the Covid-19 on the global political economy. It does so through a qualitative content analysis of the key policy documents published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since the outbreak of the pandemic crisis. The IMF has been, historically, one of the main designers of international macroeconomic governance. The paper focuses on fiscal policy, which retains a central place in the strategy of the IMF to deal with the pandemic and especially for the post-pandemic recovery phase. The analysis of the documents of the IMF contributes (i) to appreciate the interpretation of the nature of the pandemic crisis through the lenses of a prominent international financial institution, (ii) to explore the policy strategy outlined to deal with the pandemic emergency, (iii) to assess possible changes at the level of policy, and accordingly, future directions in global political economy. Evidence suggests that fiscal stimulus, public investment and planning will likely have a prominent position in the future directions of the IMF policy advice.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v14i1p38

Keywords: Covid-19; International Monetary Fund; Fiscal Policy; Planning; State intervention

References


Babb S. (2013), “The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor”, Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 268-297.

Ban C. (2015), “Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the International Monetary Fund since the Great Recession”, Governance, 28(2): 167-183.

Ban C., K. Gallagher (2015), “Recalibrating policy orthodoxy: The IMF since the great recession”, Governance, 28(2): 131-146.

Ban C. (2020), “Ben Clift’s The IMF and the Politics of Austerity”, Comparative European Politics, 18: 78-84.

Bayliss K., Fine B., and E. Van Waeyenberge (2011), The political economy of development: The World Bank, neoliberalism and development research, London: Pluto Press.

Broome A. (2015), “Back to basics: the great recession and the narrowing of IMF policy advice”, Governance, 28(2): 147-165.

Carroll T. (2012), “Introduction: Neo-liberal development policy in Asia beyond the post-Washington consensus”, Journal of contemporary Asia, 42(3): 350-358.

Chwieroth Jeffrey M. (2014) “Controlling Capital: The International Monetary Fund and Transformative Incremental Change from Within International Organisations”, New Political Economy, 19(3): 445-469.

Clift B. (2018), The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clift B. (2019) “Contingent Keynesianism: the IMF’s model answer to the post-crash fiscal policy efficacy question in advanced economies”, Review of International Political Economy, online first version. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1640126

Clift B., J. Tomlinson (2007) “Credible Keynesianism? New Labour Macroeconomic Policy and the Political Economy of Coarse Tuning”, British Journal of Political Science, 37(1): 47-69

Cowling K., P.R. Tomlinson (2011) “Post the ‘Washington Consensus’: economic governance and industrial strategies for the twenty-first century”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(5): 831-852.

Fine B., Lapavitsas C., and J. Pincus, (eds. 2003), Development policy in the twenty-first century: beyond the post-Washington consensus, London: Routledge.

Fine B., Bayliss K., and E. Van Waeyenberge, (2011). “Whither World Bank Research?”. In Bayliss K., Fine B., and E. Van Waeyenberge. (eds), The political economy of development: The World Bank, neoliberalism and development research, 263-283. London: Pluto Press.

Genovese A., Morris J., Koh S. C. L., and A. Acquaye (2020), “An investigation into design and performance of supply chains for public procurement projects”, Production Planning & Control, online first version, 1-20.

Güven A. B. (2018), “Whither the post-Washington Consensus? International financial institutions and development policy before and after the crisis”, Review of International Political Economy, 25(3): 392-417.

Grabel I. (2011), “Not Your Grandfather’s IMF: Global Crisis, ‘Productive Incoherence’ and Developmental Policy Space”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(5): 805–830.

Grabel I. (2017), When Things don’t Fall Apart: Global Financial Governance and Developmental Finance in an age of Productive Incoherence, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

Hodson D. (2015), “The IMF as a de facto institution of the EU: A multiple supervisor approach”, in Review of International Political Economy, 22(3): 570-598.

IMF, Annual Report (various years), Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/areb?page=1

IMF (2020a), Fiscal Monitor: Policies to Support People During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, April.

IMF (2020b), Fiscal Monitor: Policies to Support People During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, October.

IMF (2020c), World Economic Outlook: the Great Lockdown, Washington, April.

IMF (2020d), World Economic Outlook: the Great Lockdown, Washington, October.

IMF (2020e) Global Financial Stability Report: Markets in the Time of Covid-19, Washington, April.

IMF (2020f) Global Financial Stability Report: Markets in the Time of Covid-19. Washington, October.

IMF (2021) Social Repercussions of the Pandemic. Working Paper No. 2021/021. Prepared by P. Barrett and S. Chen. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/01/29/Social-Repercussions-of-Pandemics-50041.

McMichael P. (2016), Development and Social Change. A Global Perspective. Sixth Edition, London, Sage.

Moschella M. (2010), Governing Risk. The IMF and Global Financial Crisis, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Peet R. (2009), Unholy trinity: the IMF, World Bank and WTO, London: Zed Books Ltd.

Rogers C. (2012), The IMF and European economies: Crisis and conditionality, London: Springer.

Saad-Filho A. (2010). “Growth, poverty and inequality: From Washington consensus to inclusive growth”, DESA Working Paper No. 100, 1-20.

Sheppard, E., and H. Leitner (2010), “Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus”, Geoforum, 41(2): 185-194.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002) Globalization and its Discontents, New York, Norton.

Strange, G. (2014). Towards a new political economy of development: states and regions in the post-neoliberal world, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stubbs T., Kring W., Laskaridis C., Kentikelenis A., and K. Gallagher (2020), “Whatever it takes? The global financial safety net, Covid-19, and developing countries”, World Development, 137, 105171.

Thirkell-White, B. (2005) The IMF and the Politics of Financial Globalization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Vetterlein A., and M. Moschella (2014), “International organizations and organizational fields: explaining policy change in the IMF”. In European Political Science Review, 6(1): 143-165.

Wade R. H. (2002), “US hegemony and the World Bank: the fight over people and ideas”, Review of International Political Economy, 9(2): 215-243.

Williamson J. (1990), ‘What Washington Means by Policy Reform’, in J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, Washington: Institute for International Economics, pp. 5–20.

World Bank (1996), World Development report. From Plan to Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

World Bank (1997), World Development report. The State in a Changing World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

World Bank (2002), World Development report. Building Institutions for Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woods N. (2006), The globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their borrowers, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.