Paradoxes of Democracy and Depoliticisation in the Social Peripheries of Modernity


Abstract


At the end of the 20th Century, the global diffusion of economic neoliberalism represents, seen from diverse perspectives, the outcome of a communicative overlapping between the economic system and the political system. This overlapping is equivalent to a functional intrasparency, which generates paradoxes of democracy as the depoliticisation and exclusion phenomena when facing inclusion expectations, as occurs in the peripheries of the world. Depoliticisation, in fact, appears as a paradox of democratic systems closely related to the development of the technocratic practices and the enhancement of the bureaucratic apparatus. One of the characteristics of technocracy is that it lies on the assumption that great decisions are of technical nature, not political. If great decisions may be taken by means of technical instruments, it means that there is no longer need for 'professional politicians', and even less need for people's participation. Technocracy and burocracy converge above the traditional sphere reserved to politics. The consequence of this convergence is, in fact, depoliticisation. In other words, there is a relation between technocracy, burocracy and ideological crises. Hence, the more technical the decision-making process, the more burocratized will the process of power be, and the more deideologized will the process of fundamental choices be. Populist movements thus describe the effect of the attempt of providing responses to the issues of modern society, to the extent in which the economic value becomes the only discriminating variable between what is correct and what is wrong (what is economically pointless must be discarded) and it actually move the decisional process away from the political sphere, enhancing the differences between the center and the periphery, between inclusion and exclusion. In the light of such trends, which have become extensively resilient in the systems, how can the process of functional specification of social systems (economics, politics) be implemented in the peripheries of modernity? If trust in the political system lessens vis à vis problem-solving capabilities, how the consequent uncertainty be absorbed? This essay aims to describing the extent in which the depoliticisation process can compensate for the pressure put on expectations against inclusion values. The theme is tackled with an outlook that stems from the epistemological mutation of globalization and, consequently, from the resolution of the traditionally axial center/periphery pattern, and focuses on the analysis of peripheries that come into play as the protagonists of the two-way relationship with their center, albeit the unusual democratic participation, yet to be interpreted.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v10i3p874

Keywords: depoliticisation; neoliberalism; populism; paradoxes of democracy; peripheries of modernity

References


Alcoforado F. (1997), Globalização, San Paolo, Editoria Nobel.

Arrow K. J. (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values; New York, Wiley & Sons.

Baraldi C., Corsi G., Esposito E. (2002), Luhmann in glossario, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Bazzicalupo L. (2016), Populismo y liberalismo: la pretensión de la inmanencia, in «Soft Power», n. 2/2016, pp. 57-70.

Bobbio N. (1999), Teoria generale della politica, Torino, Einaudi.

Buchanan J. M., Gordon T. (1962), The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Buchanan J. M. (1989), Stato, mercato e libertà, Il Mulino, Bologna.

Caldiron G. (2005), Banlieue. Vita e rivolta nelle periferie della metropoli, Roma, Manifestolibri.

Castañeda Sabido F., Cuéllar Vàsquez A. (1998), Redes de inclusiòn. La construcciòn social de la autoridad, Porrúa, UNAM.

Condorcet M. J. A. N., de Caritat (Marquis de) (1785), Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, Paris, De l’Imprimerie Royale.

Corsi G, De Giorgi R. (1999), Ridescrivere la Questione Meridionale, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia.

Crozier M., Huntington S., Watanuki J. (1977), La crisi della democrazia: rapporto sulla governabilità delle democrazie alla Commissione Trilaterale, Milano, Franco Angeli.

De Giorgi R., Magnolo S. (2005), Mondi della società del mondo, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia.

De Giorgi R. (2006), Temi di filosofia del diritto, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia.

Di Viggiano P.L (2012a), Periferie sociali dello Stato moderno, in «Rivista Elettronica di Diritto, Economia e Management», n. 2/2012, pp. 291-311.

Di Viggiano P.L. (2012b), Periferias sociales del Estado moderno, in «Criterio y Conducta», n. 12/2012, pp. 21-55.

Eisenstandt S. N., Roniger L. (1984), Patrons Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Esposito E. (2002), Identità/differenza, in Baraldi C., Corsi G., Esposito E. (Eds.), Luhmann in glossario, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Fawcett P., Marsh D. (2014), Depoliticisation, governance and political participation, in «Policy & Politics», n. 2/2014, pp. 171-188.

Friedman M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Fukuyama F. (1989), The End of History, Washington, National Affairs.

Galeotti A. E. (1993), Citizenship and Equality: The Place for toleration, in «Political Theory», n. 4/1993, pp. 585-605.

Galeotti A. E. (2010), La politica del rispetto. I fondamenti etici della democrazia, Bari, Editori Laterza.

Galli, C. (2011), Il disagio della democrazia, Torino, Einaudi.

Giannone D. (2016), Explaining the Making of Neoliberal Evaluative State, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto», n. 2/2016, pp. 495-516.

Gozzi G. (1982), La differenziazione del potere, in N. Luhmann N. (Ed.), Potere e codice politico, Milano, Feltrinelli.

Hay C. (2014), Depoliticisation as process, governance as practice: what did the ‘first wave’ get wrong and do we need a ‘second wave’ to put it right?, in «Policy & Politics», n. 2/2014, pp. 293-311.

Hayek F. A. (1944), The Road of Serfdom, London-New York, Routledge.

Hollingsworth J. R., Boyer R. (1997), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Jessop B. (2002), Liberalism, neoliberalism and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective, in «Antipode», n. 3/2002, pp. 458-478.

Jessop B. (2007a), State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach, 2007, Cambridge, Polity Press.

Jessop B. (2007b), New Labour or the normalization of neo-liberalism, in «British Politics», n. 3/2007, pp. 282-288.

Jessop B. (2008), Zur Relevanz von Luhmann’s Systemtheorie und von Laclau und Mouffe`s Diskursanalyse für die Weiterentwicklung der marxistischen Staatstheorie, in J. Hirsch, J. Kannankulam, J. Wissel (Eds.), Der Staat der bürger-lichen Gesellschaft. zum Staatsverständnis von Karl Marx, Baden-Baden, Nomos.

Jessop B. (2014), Repoliticising depoliticisation: theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and Eurozone debt crises, in «Policy & Politics», n. 2/2014, pp. 207-223.

Keynes J. M. (1920), The economic consequences of the peace, New York, Brace and Hove.

Keynes J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Marinelli A. (1993), La costruzione del rischio. Modelli e paradigmi interpretativi nelle scienze sociali, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Lafay G. (1996), Capire la globalizzazione, Bologna, Il Mulino.

Lastrico V. (2016), Power And Resistance in the Neoliberal Age, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto», n. 2/2016, pp. 358-386.

Luhmann N. (1971), Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung, Westdeutscher Verlag.

Luhmann N. (1984), Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.

Luhmann N. (1985), Come è possibile l’ordine sociale, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Luhmann N. (1990), La differenziazione del diritto, Bologna, Il Mulino.

Luhmann N. De Giorgi R. (1991), Teoria della Società, Milano, FrancoAngeli.

Luhmann N. (1992), Beobachtungen der Moderne, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH.

Luhmann N. (1997), The control of intransparency, in «Systems Research and Behavioral Science», n. 6/1997, pp. 359-371.

Luhmann N. (1999), Causalità nel Sud, in G. Corsi, R. De Giorgi (Eds.), Ridescrivere la Questione Meridionale, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia.

Mancarella A. (1995), Norberto Bobbio e la politica della cultura, Manduria-Bari-Roma, Piero Lacaita Editore.

Mastropaolo A., (2011), La democrazia è una causa persa? Paradossi di un’invenzione imperfetta, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.

Mela A. (2007), Sociologia delle città, Roma, Carocci.

Moini G. (2012), Teoria critica della partecipazione: un approccio sociologico, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Mueller D. C. (1979), Public Choice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Nixon A. (2014), The New Geography of Capitalism: Firms, Finance, and Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Norris P. (Ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford Oxford, University Press.

Peck J, Theodore N. (2007), Variegated Capitalism, in «Progress in Human Geography», n. 6/2007, pp. 731-772.

Petrucciani S. (2014), Democrazia, Torino, Einaudi.

Pharr S. J., Putnam R. D. (2000), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the TrilateralCountries?, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Pigou C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare, New York, Macmillan.

Rosanvallon P. (2008), La légitimité démocratique: impartialité, réflexivité, proximité, Éditions du Seuil, Paris.

Rosanvallon P. (2009), La politica nell'era della sfiducia, Città aperta, Troina.

Salento A., Pesare G. (2016), Liberalisation and Value Extraction. The Trajectory of Railways in the Neo-Liberal State, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto», n. 2/2016, pp. 466-494.

Sassen S. (1995), Losing Control? Sovereignty in the Age of Globalisation, New York, Columbia University Press.

Sassen S. (2006), Territory, Authority, Rights: from Medieval to Global Assembleges, Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press.

Shennan J. H. (1974), The Origins of the Modern European State, London, Hutchinson.

Spencer-Brown G. (1969), Laws of Form, London, George Allen & Unwin.

Stiglitz J, E. (2007), Making Globalization Work, New York-London, W. W. Norton & Company.

Véron J. (2006), L’urbanisation du monde, Paris, Éditions La Découverte.

Wallerstein I. (1979), The capitalist world-economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.