Email this article Exploring the intersection of two linguistic variables in British English dialects
Abstract
The bulk of sociolinguistic research has focused on covariation between linguistic variables and social factors e.g. when a phonological variable is involved in covariation with social variables or other linguistic variables (Trudgill 1974). Recent research, however, note that little attention has been devoted to how multiple linguistic variables are interrelated in a given speech community (Guy, Hinskens 2016). Along this line, this paper investigates the covariation of two linguistic variables which intersect in British English: (t)-deletion and (t)-glottaling in the C(C)t linguistic context (e.g. want, kept). Data was gathered from 36 participants by means of sociolinguistic interviews, reading passages, and word lists in three British speech communities. 1,275 tokens were gathered. Data was transcribed in ELAN, with support from visual cues in the spectrogram in PRAAT, and mixed-effects logistic regression analyses was carried out. Results show that less sonorous preceding segments favour (t)-deletion, whereas more sonorous ones favour (t)-glottaling. The preceding and following phonological environments, syllable stress, style, and sex of participants were also found to play a significant role.
References
Anttila A. 2002, Variation and phonological theory, in Chambers J.K., Trudgill P. and Schilling-Estes N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Blackwell, Malden/ Oxford, pp. 206-243.
Ashby M. and Maidment J. 2005, Introducing Phonetic Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Baranowski M. and Turton D. 2020, TD-deletion in British English: New evidence for the long-lost morphological effect, in “Language Variation and Change” 31, pp. 1-23.
Barrera B.B. 2015, A Sociolinguistic Study of T-glottalling in Young RP: Accent, Class and Education, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
Ciancia C. 2021, Linguistic diffusion of word-final /t/ glottaling in southern British English dialects, Paper presented at The International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE-6), University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland, 2-5 June.
Ciancia C. 2023, Beyond Standard English. Variation and Change in Easter England, Carocci, Rome.
Ciancia C. forthcoming, (t) Glottaling in East Anglian English: New Phonological Insights, in “English Today”.
Ciancia C. and Patrick P.L. 2019, Revealing new phonological insights into (t,d) deletion. An ol’ variable unexplored in the South East of England, Paper presented at New Ways of Analysing Variation (NWAV-48), University of Oregon, Eugene (USA) 10-12 October.
Ciancia C. and Patrick P.L. forthcoming, (t,d) in East Anglia: Morphological and Phonological Patterns.
de Lacy P. 2007, The interaction of tone, sonority, and prosodic structure, in de Lacy P. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 281-308.
Fabricius A. 2000, T-glottalling, between stigma and prestige: a sociolinguistic study of modern RP, Unpublished Phd thesis, Copenhagen Business School.
Fasold R. 1972, Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis, Center for Applied Linguistics, Arlington.
Gorman K. and Johnson D.E. 2013, Quantitative analysis, in Bayley R., Cameron R. and Lucas C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 214-240.
Guy G.R. 2013, The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle sociolinguistic variables?, In “Journal of Pragmatics” 52, pp. 63-71.
Guy G.R. and Hinskens F. 2016, Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities, in “Lingua” 172-173, pp. 1-9.
Harris J. 1994, English Sound Structure, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hickey R. 2009, Weak segments in Irish English, in Donka M. (ed.), Phonological Weakness in English. From Old to Present-day English, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 116-29.
Hock H.H. and Joseph B. 1996, Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Honeybone P. 2008, Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: tracing concepts through the history of phonology, in Brandão de Carvalho J., Scheer T. and Ségéral P. (eds.), Lenition and Fortition, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 9-93.
Honeybone P. 2012, Lenition in English, in Nevalainen T. and Traugott E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 773-787.
Horvath B. and Sankoff D. 1987, Delimiting the Sydney speech community, in “Language in Society” 16, pp. 179-204.
Kerswill P. 2007, Standard and non-standard English, in Britain D. (ed.), Language in the British Isles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,pp. 34-51.
Kirchner R. 2001, An Effort Based Approach on Consonant Lenition, Routledge, New York.
Kirchner R. 2004, Consonant Lenition, in Hayes B., Kirchner R. and Steriade D. (ed.), Phonetically Based Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridege, pp. 313-345.
Johnson D.E. 2009, Getting off the Goldvarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed Effects Variable Rule Analysis, in “Language and Linguistics Compass” 3 [1], pp. 359-383.
Lass R. 1984, Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nathan G.S. 2008, Phonology. A cognitive grammar introduction, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Odden D. 2005, Introducing Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Parker S. 2002, Quantifying the Sonority Hierarchy, PhD dissertation, U Mass, Amherst.
Patrick P.L. 1999, Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the mesolect, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Patrick P.L. 2004, British Creole: phonology, in Kortmann B. and Schneider E.W. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Phonology, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 231-243.
Rice K. 1992, On deriving sonority: a structural account of sonority relationships, in “Phonology 9”, pp. 61-99.
Rickford J.R., Ball A., Blake R., Jackson R. and Martin N. 1991, Rappin’ on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African-American Vernacular English, in “Language Variation and Change” 3, pp. 103-132.
Rickford J.R. and McNair-Knox F. 1994, Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study, in Biber D. and Finegan E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 235-276.
Rose D. and Harrison E. 2010, Social Class in Europe: An Introduction to the European Socio-economic Classification, Routledge, New York.
Santa Ana A.O. 1996, Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English, in “Language Variation and Change” 8 [1], pp. 63-89.
Tamminga M. 2019, Interspeaker covariation in Philadelphia vowel change, in “Language Variation and Change, 31, pp. 119-133.
Temple R. 2014, Where and what is (t, d)? a case study in taking a step back in order to advance sociophonetics”, in. Celata C. and Calamai S. (eds.), Advances in Sociophonetics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 97-134.
Trudgill P. 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Trudgill P. 2018, I’ll git the milk time you bile the kittle do you oon’t get no tea yit no coffee more oon’t I. Phonetic erosion and grammaticalization in English dialects, Paper presented at the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE) 5, London, 17-20 July.
Watson K. 2007, Liverpool English, in “Journal of the International Phonetics Association” 37, pp. 351-360.
Wells J.C. 1982, Accents of English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wolfram W. 1993, Identifying and interpreting variables, in Preston D.R. (ed.), American Dialect Research, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 193-221.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
