Email this article The role of affinity in attitudes towards the English of native and non-native speakers
Abstract
Abstract – To examine the issue of how far ELF can be endonormative, we report on a matched-guise test experiment (Lambert et al. 1960) measuring NNES ELF users’ reactions to ostensibly different speakers, some of whom identified as NES, others as NNES ELF users from the outer circle. Two speakers – one NES, the other a highly proficient NNES (Graddol 2010) – made various short recordings in a studio. Each of these was modified using specialist software to make them sound like different people without affecting intelligibility as regards pronunciation. On a Likert scale, respondents rated how happy they would be to speak like the persona in question. The object was to identify patterns in the way that the features of Nativeness, on the one hand, and Affinity on the other, interacted to affect attitudes to different manifestations of English, and whether any affinity effect (our provisional term) can be shown to exist as a possible alternative to the nativeness principle (Jenkins 2007; Seidlhofer 2001, 2011). That is, whether ELF users may use other ELF users that they find attractive as models for language use rather than the idealized NES.
References
Christiansen T. 2014, Putting the accent on intelligibility: What constitutes “good” pronunciation in the context of English as a lingua franca? A case study of learners of different L1s, in “Textus” XXVII, pp. 35-51.
Christiansen T. 2017, ELF-oriented attitudes to learning English, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 21, pp 57-77.
Christiansen T. 2018a, Are native speakers the only model for ELF users?, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 26, pp. 101-120.
Christiansen T. 2018b, The role of celebrity in attitudes to the English of native and non-native speakers: a case study of female Italian ELF users, in “Lingue e Linguaggi” 28, pp. 7-32.
The Council of Europe 2001, The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Firth A. 1996, The discursive accomplishment of normality. On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 26, pp. 237-259.
Graddol D. 2010, English Next, The British Council, London.
Israel G.D. and Taylor C.L. 1990, Can Response Order Bias Evaluations?, in “Evaluation and Program Planning” 13 [4], pp. 365-371.
Jenkins J. 2007, English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kachru B.B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle, in Quirk R. and Widdowson H.G. (eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-30.
Lambert W.E., Hodgson R.C., Gardner R.C. and Fillenbaum S. 1960, Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Languages, in “Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” 20 [1], pp. 44-51.
Seidlhofer B. 2001, Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca, in Davies A. and Elder C. (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 431-450.
Seidlhofer B. 2011, Understanding English as a Lingua Franca: A complete introduction to the theoretical nature and practical implications of English used as a lingua franca, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Tomasello M. 1996, Do apes ape?, in Heyes C.M. and Galef B.G. Jr. (eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture, Academic Press, Inc, San Diego (CA), pp. 319-346.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
