Email this article The popularisation of trial discourse in 18th century periodicals. A corpus-based study of the Old Bailey Trial Proceedings and newspaper trial reports (1710-1779)
Abstract
Abstract –In this paper I examine the recounting of trials in the Old Bailey Trial Proceedings (henceforth OBPs) and in the weekly newspapers in the period from 1710 to 1779. The OBPs appeared in 1674 but became a specialised genre in the early 18th century, when their short and sensationalist accounts were replaced with more accurate renditions of all the phases of the trial. The weeklies were not a specialised trial genre per se but, insofar as they provided short trial accounts, they contributed to the popularisation of trial knowledge. In line with the principles of corpus-assisted discourse analysis, I shall combine the qualitative analysis of the text with the quantitative approach provided by Corpus Linguistics. The results will be investigated within the wider social context in which the two publications were produced and consumed, as well as within the immediate situational context, i.e. the proceedings and the weeklies as genres. In my comparative corpus-based analysis, I examine aspects related to the structuring of the information and the use of specialised vocabulary. The study suggests that by the end of the century, newspapers had the better of the OBPs in the print market, thanks to a skilful balance of specialised discourse and newsworthiness in a publication which was cheap, swift to produce and easy to be consumed.
References
Primary Sources
The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913. www.oldbaileyonline.org (12.05.2018).
The British Newspaper Archive, 1607-2013. www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk (12.05.2018).
Secondary Sources
Baker H. 1998, Newspapers, Politics, and Public Opinion in Late Eighteenth-Century England, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Beattie J.M. 2001, Policing and Punishment in London 1660-1750. Urban crime and the limits of terror, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Black J. 2011, The English Press in the Eighteenth Century, Croom Helm, London and Sydney.
Brownlees N. 2015, ‘We have in some former bookes told you’: The significance of metatext in 17th-century English news, in Bȍs B. and Kornexl L. (eds.), Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse, Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, Benjamins, Philadelphia, pp. 3-22.
Cecconi E. 2009, Comparing seventeenth-century news broadsides and occasional news pamphlets: Interrelatedness in news reporting, in Jucker A.H. (ed.), Early Modern English News Discourse. Newspapers, pamphlets and scientific news discourse, Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 137-158.
Cecconi E. 2011, Power confrontation and verbal duelling in the arraignment section of XVII century trials, in “Journal of Politeness Research” 7, pp. 101-121.
Deveraux S. 2003, The Fall of the Session Paper: The Criminal Trial and the Popular Press in Late Eighteenth-Century London, in “Criminal Justice History” 18, pp. 57-88.
Deveraux S. 2007, From Sessions to Newspapers? Criminal Trial Reporting, the Nature of Crime and the London Press, 1770-1800, in “The London Journal” 32 [1], pp. 1-27.
Gladfelder H. 2001, Criminality and Narrative in Eighteenth-Century England. Beyond the Law, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
Haarman L. and Lombardo L. 2009, Introduction, in Haarman L. and Lombardo L. (eds.), Evaluation and stance in war news: A linguistic analysis of American, British and Italian television news reporting of the 2003 Iraqi war, Continuum, London, pp. 1-26.
Jucker A.H. 2005, Mass media communication from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century, in Skaffari J., Peikola M., Carroll R. and Hiltunen R. (eds.), Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 134), Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 7-21.
Jucker A. and Taavitsainen I. 2013, English Historical Pragmatics, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
King P. 2007, Newspaper reporting and attitudes to crime and justice in late eighteenth and early nineteenth century London, in “Continuity and Change” 22 [1], pp. 73-112.
Lemmings D. 2012, Negotiating Justice in the New Public Sphere: Crime, the Courts and the Press in Early Eighteenth Century Britain, in Lemmings D. (ed.), Crime, Courtrooms and the Public Sphere in Britain, 1700-1850, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 119-146.
Pahta P. and Taavitsainen I 2010, Scientific Discourse, in Jucker H.A. and Taavitsainen I. (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 549-586.
Partington A. 2004, Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast, in Partington A., Morley J. and Haarman L. (eds.), Corpora and Discourse, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 11-20.
Partington A. 2008, The Armchair and the Machine: Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies, in Taylor T.C., Ackerley K. and Castello E. (eds.), Corpora for University Language Teachers, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 95-118.
Raymond J. 2003, Pamphlets and pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shoemaker R.B. 2008, The Old Bailey proceedings and the representation of crime and criminal justice in eighteenth-ce
ntury London, in “Journal of British Studies” 47 [3], pp. 559-580.
Stubbs M. 1996, Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture, Blackwell, Oxford.
Stubbs M. 2001, Words and phrases. Corpus studies of lexical semantics, Blackwell, Oxford.
Taavitsainen I. and Jucker A.H. 2010, Trends and developments in historical pragmatics, in Jucker A.H. and Taavitsainen I. (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 3-30.
Walsham A. 1999, Providence in Early Modern England, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ward R.M. 2014, Print Culture, Crime and Justice in 18th-Century London, Bloomsbury, London.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
