Virtual Parliament in Italy: if not now, when? The debate about a virtual Parliament during the pandemic emergency


Abstract


The emergence and spread of the Covid-19 emergency in Italy, as in the rest of the world, required parliaments to balance two priorities: ensuring the continuity of parliamentary work and protecting the health of their members and staff. If, in some legislative assemblies, the difficult balance between the right to health and the functioning of parliamentary institutions has been pursued through the implementation of measures that contemplate the use of remote participation and voting, the choices made by the Italian chambers have been more conservative, never coming to favor such solutions, at least in the plenary. This paper contributes to the debate on the digitization of parliamentary assemblies by analyzing the political reasons behind the decision to maintain the status quo in Italy, a country where the containment measures to limit the spread of Covid-19 were among the strictest in the world.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20398573v9n1p5

Keywords: Italy; Parliament; Remote voting; Digitalization; Covid-19

References


Bar-Siman-Tov, I., Rozenberg, O., Benoît, C., Waismel-Manor, I., & Levanon, A. (2021). Measuring Legislative Activity during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Introducing the ParlAct and ParlTech Indexes. International Journal of Parliamentary Studies, 1(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1163/26668912-bja10006

Biondi, F., & Villaschi, P. (2020). Il funzionamento delle Camere durante l’emergenza sanitaria. Riflessioni sulla difficile praticabilità di un Parlamento “telematico”. Federalismi.it, 18, 26-48.

Bolleyer, N., & Salát, O. (2021). Parliaments in times of crisis: COVID-19, populism and executive dominance. West European Politics, 44(5–6), 1103-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1930733

Brunet, S. (2022). The Hyper-Executive State of Emergency in France. In M. C. Kettemann, & K. Lachmayer (Eds.), Pandemocracy in Europe: Power, Parliaments and People in Times of COVID-19 (pp. 201-224). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509946396

Calvano, R. (2020). Brevi note su emergenza COVID e voto dei parlamentari a distanza. Rappresentanza politica, tra effettività e realtà virtuale. Federalismi.it, 21, pp. 45-61.

Chiru, M. (2023). Parliamentary oversight of governments’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Literature review. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/25071

Deseriis, M. (2017). Direct Parliamentarianism: An Analysis of the Political Values Embedded in Rousseau, the “Operating System” of the Five STAR Movement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 9(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.32

Díaz Crego, M., & Mańko, R. (2022). Parliaments in emergency mode: Lessons learnt after two years of pandemic. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service PE 698.879 - January 2022, pp.1-12.

Fitsilis, F., & Costa, O. (2022). Parliamentary Administration Facing the Digital Challenge. In T. Christensen, E. Griglio, & N. Lupo (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Parliamentary Administrations (pp. 105-120). Routledge.

Griglio, E. (2020). Governments as Covid-19 Lawmakers in France, Italy and Spain: Continuity or Discontinuity. European Journal of Law Reform, 22(4), 398-413.

Ibrido, R. (2021). Alla ricerca della “giusta distanza”: Il formato tecnologico dei lavori parlamentari in Italia e in Spagna durante la crisi pandemica. Il Filangieri, Quaderno 2020, 77-102.

Ibrido, R. (2022a). Evoluzioni tecnologiche o involuzioni costituzionali? La “reingegnerizzazione” del processo di decisione parlamentare. Osservatorio Sulle Fonti, 2022(2), 291-310.

Ibrido, R. (2022b). Sul problema della praticabilità del voto da remoto in occasione delle elezioni del Presidente della Repubblica: Alcune ipotesi interpretative. Diritti Comparati, last accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.diritticomparati.it/sul-problema-della-praticabilita-del-voto-da-remoto-in-occasione-delle-elezioni-del-presidente-della-repubblica-alcune-ipotesi-interpretative/

Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2021). World e-parliament report 2020. Inter-Parliamentary Union. https://www.ipu.org/file/11896/download

Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2022). World e-parliament report 2022. Parliaments after the pandemic. Inter-Parliamentary Union. https://www.ipu.org/file/11896/download

Kettemann, M. C., & Lachmayer, K. (Eds.). (2022). Pandemocracy in Europe: Power, Parliaments and People in Times of COVID-19. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509946396

Lippolis, V. (2020). Parlamento a distanza? Meglio di no. Il dubbio, 1 April, last accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.ildubbio.news/giustizia/parlamento-a-distanza-meglio-di-no-lvvocfhk

Lupo, N. (2020a). L’attività parlamentare in tempo di coronavirus. Forum Di Quaderni Costituzionali, 2, 121-142.

Lupo, N. (2020b). Perché non è l’art. 64 Cost. A impedire il voto “a distanza” dei parlamentari. E perché ammettere tale voto richiede una “re-ingegnerizzazione” dei procedimenti parlamentari. Osservatorio Costituzionale, 2020(3), last accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.osservatorioaic.it/it/osservatorio/ultimi-contributi-pubblicati/nicola-lupo/perche-non-e-l-art-64-cost-a-impedire-il-voto-a-distanza-dei-parlamentari-e-perche-ammettere-tale-voto-richiede-una-re-ingegnerizzazione-dei-procedimenti-parlamentari

Lupo, N. (2021). La rivoluzione digitale e i suoi effetti sull’attività parlamentare. Lo Stato, 17(LUGLIO 2021-DICEMBRE 2021), 291-309.

Lupo, N., & Lippolis, V. (Eds.). (2021). Il parlamento nell’emergenza pandemica. Il Filangieri, Quaderno 2020.

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.

Malaschini, A. (2020). Procedure parlamentari e legislazione d’emergenza. SoG Working Paper, 57, last accessed 7 July 2023, https://sog.luiss.it/sites/sog.luiss.it/files/SOG%20Working%20Paper%2057_0.pdf

Malaschini, A., & Pandolfelli, M. (2022). PARLTECH. Intelligenza Artificiale e Parlamenti: Una prima riflessione. Luiss Working Paper Series, SOG-WP69/2022, last accessed 7 July 2023. https://sog.luiss.it/sites/sog.luiss.it/files/Malaschini-Padolfelli%20WP69%202022r.pdf

Mazzina, P. (2022). Dalla torsione della forma di governo alla verticalizzazione della decisione parlamentare: Lo svolgimento dei lavori delle camere in tempo di pandemia e lo smart voting. Diritto Pubblico Europeo - Rassegna online, 17(1), Article 1, 278-300. https://doi.org/10.6093/2421-0528/9150

Mencarelli, A. (2021). Parliaments Facing the Virtual Challenge: A Conceptual Approach for New Models of Representation. Parliamentary Affairs, 75(4), 904-918. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab052

Pedersen, H. H., & Borghetto, E. (2021). Fighting COVID-19 on Democratic Terms. Parliamentary Functioning in Italy and Denmark during the Pandemic. Representation, 57(4), 401-418. https://doi.org/0.1080/00344893.2021.1973546

Pertici, A. (2020). Riunirsi e votare in via telematica? Una soluzione che non convince. Quaderni Costituzionali, 2, 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1439/97138

Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Radio Radicale. (2021). Quirinale: «e io ripropongo il voto a distanza». Intervista con Stefano Ceccanti [Text]. Radio Radicale. 29 December, last accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.radioradicale.it/scheda/656792/quirinale-e-io-ripropongo-il-voto-a-distanza-intervista-con-stefano-ceccanti

Sciannella, L. G. (2020). La crisi pandemica da Covid-19 e la “trasformazione digitale” dei Parlamenti. Un’analisi comparata. DPCE Online, 43(2), Article 2, last accessed 7 July 2023. https://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/1026

Sieberer, U. (2011). The Institutional Power of Western European Parliaments: A Multidimensional Analysis. West European Politics, 34(4), 731-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.572389

Sieberer, U., Meißner, P., Keh, J. F., & Müller, W. C. (2016). Mapping and Explaining Parliamentary Rule Changes in Europe: A Research Program. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12106

Siefken, S. T. (2022). The Bundestag in the Pandemic Year 2020/21 – Continuity and Challenges in the Covid-19 Crisis. German Politics, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.2024806

Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Waismel-Manor, I., Bar-Siman-Tov, I., Rozenberg, O., Levanon, A., Benoît, C., & Ifergane, G. (2022). Should I Stay (Open) or Should I Close? World Legislatures during the First Wave of Covid-19. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221090615


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.